Peer Anaylsis- Juno

Group	How was the use of camera shots?	Use of editing?	Use of lighting?	Overall success of video
Charlotte    Benjy   Ben	Most of the shots where pretty good apart from the shakiness of them. You could tell that the camera was hand held.	The editing effects are used well, they used dissolve to get the right shot of the feet they also used the colour emboss to make it more like the original which is very effective.	They were filming outside so the only lighting they used was natural.	The overall video is great, it is very similar to the original, you can tell that they took a lot of time to produce this. The only thing i suggest is to find a stabiliser for the camera.
Lara       Dom	The very first shot is very shaky, its hard to focus on Dom with his head being cropped out of the shot. Apart from this the shots are very still and focused, with each shot close to that of the original it is very good.	The cartoon effect that they used is very effective, they have taken into consideration the original clip and reproduced this on their own. They also used the slow motion tool, although it does not suit some aspects of the Juno opening it is appropriate for others, they seem to have mastered this concept very well.	They were filming outside so the only lighting they used was natural.	The overall video is mixed they have great shots with the correct length of the original but they also have some scenes in the wrong order, this is a small mistake that they could easily rectify. All in the piece is good, small adjustment need to be made in order for it get better.
Sarah  George  Kaitlyn	Compared to others the very first shot is extremely stable is obvious they used a stabiliser.  They also put in the extra detail for example 'the runner' this is not in any other clips, so its refreshing to see they considered the original. The only thing I would suggest is the ending, which is very abrupt, if they managed to smoothed it then it would be fantastic.	They editing their piece well; the shots were well timed and considered the original. They used an effect witch made the clip more of a cartoon than it would be if the effect was not used.  They also used different transitions to break up the shots which I thought was done effectively.	They were filming outside so the only lighting they used was natural.	The overall video was the best I have seen. Its precise timing along with with the different transitions brought the clip all together, the fact that they timed it along to the original helped tremendously  One thing they could improve on was the smoothness of the ending. It ended abruptly  if this was smoother the clip would be amazing.
James B  Megan	Like the others the others some shots are very shaky, this shows that a stabiliser was not used during the making. One shot due to the shaking Megan's head was cut of for a small duration however the shots were clear and precise, mimicking that of the original.	They used one effect called 'push' for the foot shot. Apart from that I do not think they used any other effect.	They were filming outside so the only lighting they used was natural.	Overall I think the clip was a good effort, they found an effect that worked for what they wanted. They had the shots in the correct order and for the right amount of time. Overall a good job.